Home
June 29, 2020 • How to

How to setup a lead scoring model in Sitecore

Summarize & listen to article

In this blog I show you how a lead scoring model can be configured in Sitecore. Before we dive into any details let’s look at a scoring model first.

Lead scoring model

Often lead scoring models are a matrix, like the example below. It is used to score a lead based on two criteria/dimensions:

In the model above the letters A, B, C, D are used for the Profile criteria. The numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 are used for the Engagement criteria. The combination of the two determine how much effort and with which actions you should nurture your leads, or not. D4 is the least qualified lead and A1 should be handover to sales.

Translation to Sitecore

So all this theory is nice but how does this work in Sitecore? Let’s break it down a bit and create our ingredient list:

Now we can determine what Sitecore capabilities we need for each ingredient:

Show it more visually please!

A picture says more than thousand words right? So let me show you some more details per ingredient.

Profile criteria

This one obviously requires something like a CRM connection. You need demographic data which requires known visitors. But if you have a nightly synchronization you have that same data available in Sitecore. A simple profile looks like follows where I use the Job Title field for my lead scoring model.

Engagement criteria

The most easy one is the engagement criteria. Based on the needed criteria for your lead scoring model you probably have to setup some goals or campaigns and some other stuff, but if you do, it will automatically flow into the xDB. So all interactions and events are stored and appear at the visitors profile, like in the image below.

Saving the score

Like explained earlier, you can use the Sitecore Profiles to store the score. My configuration where I have keys and pattern cards for every possible score looks like follow:

I have chosen a straight forward implementation where the maximum value a profile key can have is just 1, because the logic for assigning is done in the marketing automation plan.

Automation for assigning

Last but not least you combine everything in an automation plan. This can be a large plan depending on the complexity of your scoring model. In my example it is pretty simple. Checks that I do are for example:

An example automation plan looks like follows:

The small yellow diamonds are the checks for the profile criteria. From there evaluate the engagement criteria based on needs. It helps to create a table with description to determine when someone should be scored with what lead score.

In my example it ends with assigning the profile key (A1, A2, D4) but you can extend this easily. For example by moving someone with the B2 score to another campaign. Or if a visitor scores A1, update the CRM record and handover to sales.

From here you can also use the matched lead score for personalization purposes on your pages or even in email marketing (EXM).

Possibilities are almost endless!

Running in the background?

Eh, yeah but Sitecore does not have a lead scoring engine that continously evaluates and scores contacts, so now what? You are right. But you can achieve something close to that by scheduling the automation plan to run each day at a specific time. If you use a contact list to store every known contact and allow that contacts can be enrolled unlimited times in the same automation plan, they are evaluated every day. So once a score changes you can respond accordingly. Or use a drip campaign approach where someone is enrolled only once added to a list.

Small note, with large amounts of known contacts this can probably impact performance.

Hopefully you have a better understanding of how Sitecore can drive your lead scoring model and which capabilities you have to think of a solution to implement it.

Digital Transformation Lead

Barend Emmerzaal

Experienced digital strategist and digital transformation lead with a passion for generative AI. I focus on creating digital experiences that drives business outcomes.

Was this article useful?